top of page
Vector (Stroke) (1).png

On Building Antifragile Startup - Part 1

"Antifragile: Things That Gain from Disorder" is a book by Nassim Nicholas Taleb. In this book, Taleb presents the concept of antifragility, which he defines as the property of certain

systems to thrive and improve under stress, volatility, and uncertainty.

Taleb argues that most systems can be divided into three categories: fragile, robust, and antifragile. Fragile systems are those that are easily damaged or destroyed by stressors, while robust systems are those that can resist stressors without being affected. Antifragile systems, on the other hand, are those that not only resist stressors but thrive and improve from them.

Taleb applies this concept to various areas of life, from economics and politics to health and personal relationships. He argues that modern society has become too focused on avoiding risk and uncertainty, which makes us more vulnerable to it in the long run. Instead, he advocates embracing randomness, variability, and disorder and building antifragile systems.

This article is the first series reflecting how entrepreneurs can build antifragile startups. My goal in this series of articles is to introduce the concept from the startup and entrepreneurship point of view. Startups are fragile. However, we have a lot of space to improve them and make them more antifragile. The concept is not binary. You are not either fragile or antifragile. There is a broad spectrum. Through this series, I hope to help entrepreneurs and startup leaders move the needle and build more antifragile organizations.

I will explain each concept Nassim discussed in his book and reflect on its meaning and implications for any startup company. I will also provide tips for building a resilient, growing, antifragile startup.

Let's start digging into the properties of each system.

Fragile Systems

Fragile systems are vulnerable to shocks, stressors, and uncertainty. They tend to break, weaken or suffer when exposed to adversity or change. Fragile entities are often characterized by rigidity, lack of adaptability, and dependence on stability.

For example, a startup depending on overly complex products or processes to sell to its customers is fragile. Such complexity makes adaptability very hard and renders a rigid team and business. By the way, this can happen even before having a product; it can occur in the founder's mind!

Robust Systems

Robust systems can withstand shocks and stressors without significant damage, change, or loss of functionality. They are resilient in adversity and can maintain their integrity under various conditions.

Robust systems, however, do not necessarily improve or grow stronger when subjected to stressors. Instead, they merely survive or endure the challenges they face. Examples of robust systems include well-diversified investment portfolios, time-tested architectural structures, or individuals with a stoic mindset. Many surviving startups can achieve this, which is a great outcome. But that's not enough.

Building a robust startup is not enough to thrive in a turbelant envionrment

Antifragile Systems

Antifragile systems go beyond mere robustness. They not only withstand shocks and stressors but benefit from and grow stronger.

Antifragile entities are characterized by adaptability, flexibility, and the ability to learn from adversity. They thrive in uncertain, volatile, or unpredictable environments, as these conditions provide opportunities for growth, improvement, and innovation. Examples of antifragile systems include certain types of startups built with strong decentralized cultures and founders with a growth mindset. More on that later on.

Final Thoughts

The antifragile concept is interesting and offers a good framework for startups to become stronger as they go through the hurdles and stresses of the early days of building a scalable business.

I will explore with you the properties of each startup. I will highlight factors contributing to startups born or becoming fragile, robust, or antifragile.

20 views0 comments
bottom of page